of Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507's structured outputs fail on DekaLLM.
The same model breaks your pipeline's structured outputs 15× more often on some inference providers than on others. Find the best one for your pipelines.
| # | Provider | Structured outputs a day | $ in / out per M | Tokens/s | Uptime | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nebius Token Factoryfp8# | 0.65% | 231k | $0.10 / $0.30 | 155 | 99.4% |
| 2 | SiliconFlowfp8# | 1.02% | 193k | $0.09 / $0.30 | 22 | 99.3% |
| 3 | DekaLLM# | 1.23% | 14k | $0.09 / $0.30 | 87 | 99.9% |
{
"provider": {
"order": [
"nebius/fp8",
"siliconflow/fp8",
"dekallm"
],
"ignore": []
}
}Give llms.txt to your agent
And which provider to use.
Your users don't see the provider. They see your model failing.
of Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507's structured outputs fail on DekaLLM.
as often on DekaLLM as on Nebius Token Factory (fp8), its best provider.
broken structured outputs a day across its 3 providers.
Releasing a model? Make your own API the one every provider is measured against.
Set the bar for your model↵